Native App Development or Hybrid App Development- Which one should you go for?

By / August 30, 2016 /

To ensure the success of your startup, you need to make the most of the limited resources available to you. From making the most of every marketing penny to managing with the pace of your development team, you are required to execute effectively and quickly. This is when hybrid app development looks like a lucrative option. It allows you to create Android and iOS apps simultaneously instead of making you write the code twice by utilizing the native language for native app development in each platform. The result is a total of two apps for half the work accounting for the kind of efficiency your startup needs.

The most important aspect of hybrid development is simplicity, but ease of use and simplicity can come with great costs once your app becomes more complex. Making a switch from native app development to hybrid app development can cost you time, money and effort which can put the company at risk. Therefore, it is important to make the right decision. Here’s a list of 3 lessons that can help you make a better decision while going for hybrid app development.

Decide what your app needs to do in the present and in the future

Your development strategy should be based on the technological requirements of your app. If the functionality of your app requires data extraction or complex communication, use of platform components like GPS, communication chips or camera or UI/UX and advanced graphics, you need to develop native. On the other hand, if the platform components are not used heavily and the design of the app or its functions are straightforward, hybrid development can equip you with the capabilities you require, with the additional benefits of efficiency and speed.

The real challenge lies in predicting the technological abilities your app will require in the future. Though you can’t predict with 100% accuracy as to what you’ll require for your app to do in future, you can always assess the present and future technological needs to the best of your ability. If the needs are bulky, go for native.

Do not let business requirements overshadow user expectations

For users, it is the app utility and the experience of using it that matters the most. The technology used for the app is of little use to them. The owners of Smartphones utilize around 26 mobile apps a month and the apps that they utilize the most have amazing UI/UX. So, if your app does not live up to these standards, users will uninstall it.

Native App Development

Though the design of the UI/UX of your app is distinct from development, aspects like responsiveness and speed are not. So, if you are attracted to the prospect of expanding quickly to both iOS and Android with hybrid development, ensure that you are not sacrificing the usability of the app. It is not that you cannot have a stunning UI/UX on a hybrid app; you can have all that but there are other limitations with hybrid so certify that these are not an issue prior to going for this route.

While selecting native app development, concentrate on one market first

If you feel like native app development best fits your app requirements, you must be wondering how to build two distinct apps with the restricted resources of a startup at an early stage. The best thing to do is to not worry about dealing with both iOS and Android markets initially. Select one platform to start and leave expansion to other platform for later stages. Your first requirement is to get a product to market and test it.

android vs ios

Once you’ve established the product in one market, consider bolstering your development effort and expanding to the other app market. Now, you’ll be required to hire more developers. Though having two teams result in increase of cost, it provides the benefit of creating intercompany competition. One team motivates the other to build a better app.

Thus, before going for a particular app development, you need to select the process that best works for the needs of your company.

This post has been viewed 1,370 times